Self Reflection- Week 5Self Reflection- Week 5

The weekly discussions start with a brief self-examination challenging you to explore your own thoughts and ideas in the practicum. The purpose is to help you develop a deeper understanding of yourself as you begin to develop the necessary clinical skills as a mental health provider. It should only take a few minutes to write, and no references are required. (As a result, note that the rubric for the self-reflections is slightly different from the standard discussion board rubric.)

Reflection topic suggestions:

Share tips, resources, and techniques that you have found useful in the clinical setting.

Discuss collaboration with your preceptor and other clinic staff, including both positive and negative interactions.

Reflect on the role change from expert FAMILY NP to New PMHNP

Describe an interesting or educational experience from your practicum.

Describe an issue you are having and possible solutions.

Post your original response by the end of Day 3. Then, by the end of Day 6, respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts.

If you copy and paste references from the course into your assignment, be sure to confirm APA formatting before submitting.

Please Note

You will not be able to delete or revise a post after you submit it. It would be in your best interest to spend a couple of minutes reviewing your post before submitting.

You will not be able to see anyone else’s posts until you post first. As soon as you submit a post, you will be able to view everyone else’s posts.

Refer to Participating in a Discussion Board for a full explanation of discussion board standards.

Rubric

Self-Reflection Rubric D
Criteria	Excellent	Satisfactory	Needs Improvement	Unsatisfactory
Response to Discussion Question(s)	9 Points Provides initial post by day 3 of the discussion forum. Includes substantial factually correct content which demonstrates evidence of comprehension, application, and/or appraisal. Includes evidence of self-reflective content which demonstrates views, beliefs, and/or feelings. Connects topic/content to professional role and/or practice. Includes all aspects of the discussion assignment.	7 Points Provides initial post by day 3 of the discussion forum. Includes some evidence of comprehension, application, and/or appraisal. Includes some evidence of self-reflective content on views, beliefs, and/or feelings. Connects topic/content to professional role and/or practice. Includes some of the aspects of the discussion assignment.	3 Points Provides initial post by day 3 of the discussion forum. Includes minimal evidence of comprehension, application, and/or appraisal. Includes minimal evidence of self-reflective content on views, beliefs, and/or feelings. Connects topic/content to professional role and/or practice. Includes minimal aspects of the discussion assignment.	0 Points Does not provide the initial post by day 3. Content is off topic, incorrect, irrelevant, and/or does not include all aspects of the discussion assignment.
Peer Responses	7 Points Provides two peer responses by day 6 of the discussion forum. Provides two peer posts on two different days. Demonstrates building on peer postings and extending the discussion. Questions posed are thoughtful and relevant. Includes substantial factually correct content which demonstrates evidence of comprehension, application, and/or appraisal. Includes evidence of self-reflective content which demonstrates views, beliefs, and/or feelings. Interaction demonstrates respect and sensitivity to others.	5 Points Provides two peer responses by day 6 of the discussion forum. Provides two peer posts on two different days. Demonstrates some building on peer postings and attempt to extend the discussion. Some questions posed are thoughtful and relevant. Includes some evidence of comprehension, application, and/or appraisal. Includes some evidence of self-reflective content which demonstrates views, beliefs, and/or feelings. Interaction demonstrates respect and sensitivity to others.	2 Points Provides one peer response by day 6 of the discussion forum and/or peer responses are posted on same day. Demonstrates minimal building on peer postings and attempt to extend the discussion. Minimal to no questions posed. Includes minimal evidence of comprehension, application, and/or appraisal. Includes minimal evidence of self-reflective content on views, beliefs, and/or feelings. Interaction demonstrates respect and sensitivity to others.	0 Points Peer responses are not provided.
Evidence	2 Points Provides evidence from practicum experience to support reflection.	0 Points Does not provide evidence from practicum experience to support reflection.
Clarity and Writing Mechanics	2 Points Provides clear, concise postings. All postings are grammatically correct with proper spelling and structure.	0 Points Postings are not clear and concise. Inability to write in own words. Excessive grammar, spelling, and structure errors noted.

Self-Reflection Rubric D

Criteria

Excellent

Satisfactory

Needs Improvement

Unsatisfactory

Response to Discussion Question(s)

9 Points
Provides initial post by day 3 of the discussion forum.
Includes substantial factually correct content which demonstrates evidence of comprehension, application, and/or appraisal.
Includes evidence of self-reflective content which demonstrates views, beliefs, and/or feelings.
Connects topic/content to professional role and/or practice.
Includes all aspects of the discussion assignment.

7 Points
Provides initial post by day 3 of the discussion forum.
Includes some evidence of comprehension, application, and/or appraisal.
Includes some evidence of self-reflective content on views, beliefs, and/or feelings.
Connects topic/content to professional role and/or practice.
Includes some of the aspects of the discussion assignment.

3 Points
Provides initial post by day 3 of the discussion forum.
Includes minimal evidence of comprehension, application, and/or appraisal.
Includes minimal evidence of self-reflective content on views, beliefs, and/or feelings. Connects topic/content to professional role and/or practice.
Includes minimal aspects of the discussion assignment.

0 Points
Does not provide the initial post by day 3.
Content is off topic, incorrect, irrelevant, and/or does not include all aspects of the discussion assignment.

Peer Responses

7 Points
Provides two peer responses by day 6 of the discussion forum.
Provides two peer posts on two different days.
Demonstrates building on peer postings and extending the discussion.
Questions posed are thoughtful and relevant. Includes substantial factually correct content which demonstrates evidence of comprehension, application, and/or appraisal.
Includes evidence of self-reflective content which demonstrates views, beliefs, and/or feelings.
Interaction demonstrates respect and sensitivity to others.

5 Points
Provides two peer responses by day 6 of the discussion forum. Provides two peer posts on two different days.
Demonstrates some building on peer postings and attempt to extend the discussion.
Some questions posed are thoughtful and relevant.
Includes some evidence of comprehension, application, and/or appraisal.
Includes some evidence of self-reflective content which demonstrates views, beliefs, and/or feelings.
Interaction demonstrates respect and sensitivity to others.

2 Points
Provides one peer response by day 6 of the discussion forum and/or peer responses are posted on same day.
Demonstrates minimal building on peer postings and attempt to extend the discussion.
Minimal to no questions posed.
Includes minimal evidence of comprehension, application, and/or appraisal.
Includes minimal evidence of self-reflective content on views, beliefs, and/or feelings. Interaction demonstrates respect and sensitivity to others.

0 Points
Peer responses are not provided.

Evidence

2 Points
Provides evidence from practicum experience to support reflection.

0 Points
Does not provide evidence from practicum experience to support reflection.

Clarity and Writing Mechanics

2 Points
Provides clear, concise postings. All postings are grammatically correct with proper spelling and structure.

0 Points
Postings are not clear and concise. Inability to write in own words. Excessive grammar, spelling, and structure errors noted.

Calculate the price of your order

Type of paper needed:

Pages:

550 words

Academic level:

We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM

Total price:

$26

The price is based on these factors:

Academic level

Number of pages

Urgency

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.